From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 8, 2005
911 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

remanding for evidentiary hearing on trial court's jurisdiction to revoke appellant's probation where the state argued the probationary period was tolled while appellant was incarcerated on unrelated charges and absconded, but the appellate court could not make that determination from the record on appeal

Summary of this case from Franklin v. State

Opinion

No. 1D04-2122.

September 8, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Okaloosa County, Thomas T. Remington, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Sheron Wells, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The appellant challenges the revocation of his probation and the sentence imposed as a result. Because it is not clear that the trial court retained jurisdiction to revoke the appellant's probation imposed for his misdemeanor conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The appellant pled no contest to possession of a controlled substance, cocaine, and possession of drug paraphernalia and was sentenced to three years' probation for possession of cocaine and one year of probation for possession of drug paraphernalia. He subsequently admitted violating the terms of his probation, and he was sentenced to 24 months' imprisonment, which included a concurrent jail term for the misdemeanor conviction of 11 months and 29 days. However, based on the record on appeal, it appears that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke the appellant's probation for the misdemeanor charge. See Aponte v. State, 896 So.2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Although the state suggests that the appellant's probationary term may have been tolled while the appellant was incarcerated on an unrelated charge and absconded, § 948.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2001), an evidentiary hearing is required to establish that determination.

Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of the appellant's probation and the sentence imposed for possession of cocaine but reverse the sentence for the misdemeanor conviction and remand the case to the trial court to determine the status of its jurisdiction.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

BENTON, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Owens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 8, 2005
911 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

remanding for evidentiary hearing on trial court's jurisdiction to revoke appellant's probation where the state argued the probationary period was tolled while appellant was incarcerated on unrelated charges and absconded, but the appellate court could not make that determination from the record on appeal

Summary of this case from Franklin v. State
Case details for

Owens v. State

Case Details

Full title:Charles OWENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 8, 2005

Citations

911 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Franklin v. State

But we see no reason to address whether there is evidence of absconding when section 948.06(1) plainly states…