Opinion
June, 1928.
Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence does not sustain the finding of the jury that the snow claimed to be in the passageway was left by defendant's employee or had been placed there by him. Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur; Hasbrouck, J., dissents.