Opinion
23-1532
01-23-2024
Unpublished
Submitted: January 18, 2024
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Missouri resident William Owens appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment and dismissal of his pro se complaint. Upon de novo review, we agree with the district court that Owens's claims were barred by res judicata. See Banks v. Int'l Union Elec., Elec., Tech., Salaried &Mach. Workers, 390 F.3d 1049, 1052 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review); see also Daredevil, Inc. v. ZTE Corp., 1 F.4th 622, 627 (8th Cir. 2021) (this court gives federal court diversity judgment same claim-preclusive effect forum's state courts would give to state court judgment); Steinbach v. Maxion Wheels Sedalia LLC, 637 S.W.3d 493, 501-02 (Mo.Ct.App. 2021) (elements of res judicata under Missouri law).
The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also grant Ocwen's pending motion to take judicial notice of filings in a prior action.