Opinion
April 18, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Since the record fails to establish that the defendant New York City Housing Authority properly served the plaintiffs with a written demand for an examination pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h, there was no bar to the commencement of the action (see, General Municipal Law § 50-h, [5]). Mangano, P.J., Balletta, O'Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.