From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. Gittere

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 6, 2022
3:21-cv-00307-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00307-MMD-CSD

12-06-2022

DARIAN OWENS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM A. GITTERE, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Respondents seek an enlargement of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss (first request) (ECF No. 29 (“Motion”)). The Respondents' reply was due on October 28, 2022. (ECF No. 28.) Respondents belatedly filed their Motion on November 21, 2022; however, Petitioner did not file an opposition to the Motion. The Court finds the request is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. Therefore, good cause exists to grant the Motion.

It is therefore ordered that Respondents' Motion (ECF No. 29) is granted nunc pro tunc. Respondents have until December 21, 2022, to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss the amended petition.


Summaries of

Owens v. Gittere

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 6, 2022
3:21-cv-00307-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Owens v. Gittere

Case Details

Full title:DARIAN OWENS, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM A. GITTERE, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 6, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-00307-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2022)