Opinion
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01886-WJM-KMT
12-28-2012
FRANCES M. OWENS, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
PURSUANT to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the orders entered in this case, FINAL JUDGMENT is entered. I. Pursuant to the Order on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 53) entered by Judge William J. Martinez on December 12, 2011, which order is incorporated by reference, it is
ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It isII. Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 78) entered on December 21, 2012 it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Title VII harassment claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a plausible claim. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent Plaintiff intended to bring a Title
VII race discrimination claims based on any adverse employment actions other than Plaintiff's non-selection for the Strategic Account Manager (EAS-23) position on August 24, 2009; the non-selection for the Shipping Solutions Specialist (EAS-23) on October 6, 2009; and the assignment as a Business Solutions Specialist on October 10, 2009, those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent Plaintiff intended to bring discrimination claims on any ground other than race, those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim.
ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 68) is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment shall enter against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendant on all of Plaintiff's race discrimination claims. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that costs shall be taxed against Plaintiff.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 28th day of December, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
___________
Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk