From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. Defazio

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 29, 2021
2:16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P

07-29-2021

THEON OWENS, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH DEFAZIO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 1, 2021, the undersigned directed the parties to inform the court, within twenty-one days of the date of the order, whether they believed a settlement conference would be beneficial. (ECF No. 234.) Both parties responded to the July 1, 2021 order. (ECF Nos. 235, 236.)

Upon consideration of the record, the court finds that appointment of counsel is appropriate for the limited purpose of representing plaintiff at the settlement conference. The undersigned will schedule a settlement conference following the appointment of counsel.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This matter is referred to the administrator of this District's pro bono panel of attorneys, Sujean Park Castelhano, for the identification of counsel to represent at a settlement conference;

2. Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 231) is granted, as discussed in this order.


Summaries of

Owens v. Defazio

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 29, 2021
2:16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Owens v. Defazio

Case Details

Full title:THEON OWENS, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH DEFAZIO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 29, 2021

Citations

2:16-cv-2750 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)