From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owen v. Whitehouse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1906
112 App. Div. 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

March, 1906.


We think the defect complained of was an irregularity merely, amendable under section 721 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure, and as it clearly appears that the defendant was not misled, the motion to vacate the attachment should have been denied. The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with costs. Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred; Jenks, J., dissented.


Summaries of

Owen v. Whitehouse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1906
112 App. Div. 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

Owen v. Whitehouse

Case Details

Full title:Percy Owen, Appellant, v. James Whitehouse, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1906

Citations

112 App. Div. 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)