From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Overton v. Warden

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 2, 2024
24-cv-06809-JSW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-06809-JSW

12-02-2024

OVERTON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JEFFREY S. WHITE, United States District Judge

On September 27, 2024, Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, sent a letter to the court that appeared to concern the conditions of his confinement. That same day, the Clerk notified Plaintiff that he needed to file his claims in a complaint, and to either pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), all within 28 days. The Clerk also mailed to Plaintiff a form complaint and IFP application, instructions, and a stamped return envelope. In the notices, Plaintiff was informed that the case would be dismissed if he did not file a complaint and either pay the filing fee or file a completed IFP application before the deadline. The deadline has passed, and no response from Plaintiff has been received. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Overton v. Warden

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 2, 2024
24-cv-06809-JSW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Overton v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:OVERTON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 2, 2024

Citations

24-cv-06809-JSW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2024)