From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Overton v. Holder

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 10, 2021
2:21-CV-0951-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-0951-DMC-P

09-10-2021

MICHAEL L. OVERTON, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM JOHN HOLDER, Respondent.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules, this case was not assigned to a District Judge when the case was filed. The parties have not consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction and the Court now finds that assignment of a District Judge is necessary to properly address the case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a District Judge and to update the docket to reflect the new case number.


Summaries of

Overton v. Holder

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 10, 2021
2:21-CV-0951-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Overton v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL L. OVERTON, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM JOHN HOLDER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 10, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-0951-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2021)