From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Overton v. Cal. Med. Facility

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:21-cv-1169 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1169 JAM KJN P

09-28-2021

MICHAEL L. OVERTON, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By an order filed August 31, 2021, plaintiff was granted twenty-one days to pay the filing fees or file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-one day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed the required documents.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Overton v. Cal. Med. Facility

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:21-cv-1169 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Overton v. Cal. Med. Facility

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL L. OVERTON, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1169 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)