From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Overton v. Assoc. Warden Business Service

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 10, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2955 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2955 MCE DAD P.

May 10, 2011


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed March 24, 2011, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 9, 2011.


Summaries of

Overton v. Assoc. Warden Business Service

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 10, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2955 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Overton v. Assoc. Warden Business Service

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LOUIS OVERTON, Plaintiff, v. ASSOC. WARDEN BUSINESS SERVICE, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 10, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2955 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)