Opinion
2:22-cv-01252-GMN-EJY
04-24-2023
ENEDINA OVERSTREET, an individual, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., a foreign corporation, DOE EMPLOYEES; DOES 120; ROE CORPORATIONS 1-20; inclusive, Defendants.
RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C. ELEANOR D. MURPHY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15071 Attorneys for Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM CHRISTIAN Z. SMITH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8266 Attorneys for Plaintiff Enedina Overstreet Inc.
RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C. ELEANOR D. MURPHY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15071 Attorneys for Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM CHRISTIAN Z. SMITH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8266 Attorneys for Plaintiff Enedina Overstreet Inc.
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Defendant WAL-MART STORES, INC. (hereafter “Defendant” or “Walmart”) by and through its counsel of record, Eleanor D. Murphy the law firm of RESNICK & LOUIS, P.C., and Plaintiff ENEDINA OVERSTREET, by and through her counsel of record, CHRISTIAN SMITH, ESQ., of RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM, hereby stipulate that the above captioned action and any and all claims asserted by Plaintiff against Wal-Mart in this action are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Each party is to bear their own attorney fees, interest, and costs.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Based upon the Parties' foregoing stipulations, the Court hereby ORDERS that this action and Plaintiffs claims herein are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear their own attorney fees, interest, and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.