From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Overgaard v. Brooklyn Bus Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1939
257 App. Div. 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

May 1, 1939.


Order denying plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his bill of particulars in an action for personal injuries and property damage reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, on condition that plaintiff submit to a physical examination on the part of the defendant (if latter so desires) with respect to the subject-matter of the proposed amendment to the bill of particulars. In the event that plaintiff is not made accessible for such an examination, the order is affirmed. The proposed amendment did not in any manner change the cause of action and its amendment involved no prejudice to the defendant. ( Kyle v. City of New York, 155 App. Div. 401.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Overgaard v. Brooklyn Bus Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1939
257 App. Div. 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Overgaard v. Brooklyn Bus Corporation

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH OVERGAARD, Appellant, v. BROOKLYN BUS CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1939

Citations

257 App. Div. 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

RASA v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Order modified by striking from the ordering paragraph everything following the word "denied", and, as so…

Ponte v. Slyvan Drug Inc.

An increase in the ad damnum is not sought. The affidavit by plaintiff's physician states that the injuries…