From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oved v. Tauber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 2004
8 A.D.3d 149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3979.

Decided June 22, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered April 23, 2003, which granted defendant-respondent's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, for appellant.

McCabe, Collins, McGeough Fowler, Mineola (Thomas M. Quinn of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan, Friedman, JJ.


The motion was properly granted based upon the deposition testimony of defendant's property manager that there was no snow or ice in the driveway where plaintiff fell at the time of the accident, and the absence of any evidence that defendant or its property manager had actual or constructive notice of the patch of ice that allegedly caused plaintiff's fall ( see Simmons v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 N.Y.2d 972).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Oved v. Tauber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 2004
8 A.D.3d 149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Oved v. Tauber

Case Details

Full title:RONIT OVED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMIL TAUBER, Defendant, MECHON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 22, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 149 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
780 N.Y.S.2d 121

Citing Cases

Hyna v. Reese

We conclude that defendant met his burden of establishing as a matter of law that he lacked constructive…