From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Outlaw v. Speight

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Sep 7, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-341 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 7, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-341 (MTT)

09-07-2012

CHARLES W. OUTLAW, III, Plaintiff, v. VERNON SPEIGHT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This case is before the Court on the Recommendation (Doc. 28) of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles on Defendants Vernon Speight, Ike Akunwanne and Vanessa Griffeth's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the Motion because the Plaintiff failed to create a genuine issue of material fact with regard to his claims against any of the above-named Defendants. The Plaintiff did not file a response to the Motion or an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. Therefore, Defendants Vernon Speight, Ike Akunwanne and Vanessa Griffeth's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED.

______________________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Outlaw v. Speight

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Sep 7, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-341 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Outlaw v. Speight

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES W. OUTLAW, III, Plaintiff, v. VERNON SPEIGHT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 7, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-341 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 7, 2012)