From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Outlaw v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 9, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-1007 (W.D. La. Apr. 9, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-1007

04-09-2015

COREY OUTLAW, Petitioner, v. C. MAIORANA, Respondent.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 17] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's Application for Federal Writ of Habeas Corpus [Docs. 1, 6 & 9] and hereby is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, because the court lacks jurisdiction to consider these claims.

Lake Charles, Louisiana, this 9, day of April, 2015.

/s/_________

PATRICIA MINALDI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Outlaw v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 9, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-1007 (W.D. La. Apr. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Outlaw v. Maiorana

Case Details

Full title:COREY OUTLAW, Petitioner, v. C. MAIORANA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Apr 9, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-1007 (W.D. La. Apr. 9, 2015)