From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Outlaw v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Jan 30, 2017
NO. 5:16-CV-0462-MTT-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jan. 30, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 5:16-CV-0462-MTT-MSH

01-30-2017

CALVIN GERARD OUTLAW, Plaintiff, v. JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Calvin Gerard Outlaw filed the above-captioned proceeding in this Court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to challenge the fact of his continued confinement at the Calhoun County Jail, in Morgan Georgia.

In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that he was arrested shortly after completing a term of incarceration in Kentucky and placed in the custody of the Georgia Department of Corrections to serve a life sentence imposed as a result of a prior conviction in Houston County Georgia. Plaintiff believed his Georgia sentence had run concurrently with his Kentucky sentence and claims that he was released in Kentucky without a hold or detainer. At the time of the arrest, however, Georgia authorities believed that Plaintiff was a "fugitive at law" and charged him with "escape." Plaintiff now claims that the escape charge is entirely false and that he should neither be confined on this charge nor denied parole based on false information. Plaintiff's claims, however, are the same or at least substantially similar to those claims made by Plaintiff in another §1983 complaint under review in this Court: Outlaw v. Owens, 5:16-cv-0456-MTT-CHW.

Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes this Court to consolidate actions that "involve a common question of law or fact." Consolidation of Plaintiff's cases will conserve judicial resources and permit the efficient resolution of Plaintiff's claims. It is therefore ORDERED that this case, no. 5:16-cv-0462-MTT-MSH, be CONSOLIDATED into Outlaw v. Owens, 5:16-cv-0456-MTT-CHW and that the present case, 5:16-cv-0462, be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED.

"[T]he lack of any Rule 42(a) motion from any party in either of the two cases is no impediment to consolidation if the relevant considerations warrant same." Chambers v. Cooney, No. 07-0373-WS-B, 2007 WL 3287364, at *1 (S.D. Ala. Nov. 2, 2007) (citing Devlin v. Transportation Comm. Int'l Union, 175 F.3d 121, 130 (2nd Cir. 1999) ("A district court can consolidate related cases under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) sua sponte.")). --------

SO ORDERED, this 30th day of January 2016.

S/ Marc T. Treadwell

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Outlaw v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Jan 30, 2017
NO. 5:16-CV-0462-MTT-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jan. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Outlaw v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:CALVIN GERARD OUTLAW, Plaintiff, v. JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Jan 30, 2017

Citations

NO. 5:16-CV-0462-MTT-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jan. 30, 2017)