From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Outland v. Outland

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jul 23, 2020
NO. 09-20-00134-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 23, 2020)

Opinion

NO. 09-20-00134-CV

07-23-2020

RANDELL ERON OUTLAND, Appellant v. NATASHA OUTLAND, Appellee


On Appeal from the 418th District Court Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 19-05-06588-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Randell Eron Outland filed a notice of appeal from the trial court's order of March 13, 2020, in which the trial judge dismissed the case for want of prosecution. On April 16, 2020, the trial judge signed an order reinstating the case. The trial court reinstated the case within the time permitted by Rule 329b(e) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(e). On April 22, 2020, we notified the parties that unless our jurisdiction over the appeal was established, the appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. No reply has been filed.

The notice of appeal invoked the Court's appellate jurisdiction to review an order that has been vacated. The Court finds it lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM Submitted on July 22, 2020
Opinion Delivered July 23, 2020 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

Outland v. Outland

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jul 23, 2020
NO. 09-20-00134-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 23, 2020)
Case details for

Outland v. Outland

Case Details

Full title:RANDELL ERON OUTLAND, Appellant v. NATASHA OUTLAND, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Jul 23, 2020

Citations

NO. 09-20-00134-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 23, 2020)