From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oullahan v. Morrissey

Supreme Court of California
Aug 30, 1887
73 Cal. 297 (Cal. 1887)

Opinion

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County.

         COUNSEL:

         D. S. Terry, F. T. Baldwin, and J. C. Campbell, for Appellant.

          James H. Budd, James A. Louttit, and W. L. Dudley, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: In Bank. McKinstry, J., expressed no opinion.

         OPINION

         THE COURT          The plaintiff, having consented to the entry of the judgment against himself, cannot appeal from it, or if he can, can be heard only as to that portion to which he did not consent. That in this case is at the most the demand for costs, which, being less than three hundred dollars, does not give this court jurisdiction.

         The appeal must be dismissed.

         So ordered.


Summaries of

Oullahan v. Morrissey

Supreme Court of California
Aug 30, 1887
73 Cal. 297 (Cal. 1887)
Case details for

Oullahan v. Morrissey

Case Details

Full title:D. J. OULLAHAN, Appellant, v. JAMES A. MORRISSEY, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Aug 30, 1887

Citations

73 Cal. 297 (Cal. 1887)
14 P. 864

Citing Cases

Judnick v. Judnick

The judgment against the sureties was in effect a consent judgment and was, therefore, unappealable by the…

Hibernia Savings and Loan Society v. Waymire

It is also settled in this state that where a party who has expressly consented to and stipulated for the…