From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oudheusden v. Oudheusden

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 26, 2019
332 Conn. 911 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

06-26-2019

Penny OUDHEUSDEN v. Peter OUDHEUSDEN

Scott T. Garosshen and Kenneth J. Bartschi, in support of the petition. Yakov Pyetranker, in opposition.


Scott T. Garosshen and Kenneth J. Bartschi, in support of the petition.

Yakov Pyetranker, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 190 Conn. App. 169, 209 A.3d 1282 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had erroneously engaged in ‘double dipping" by awarding the plaintiff alimony from income generated by the defendant's businesses and also awarding the plaintiff a percentage of those businesses in its division of property?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had abused its discretion by failing to enter financial orders that equitably divided the marital estate?"


Summaries of

Oudheusden v. Oudheusden

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 26, 2019
332 Conn. 911 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

Oudheusden v. Oudheusden

Case Details

Full title:Penny OUDHEUSDEN v. Peter OUDHEUSDEN

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jun 26, 2019

Citations

332 Conn. 911 (Conn. 2019)
209 A.3d 1232

Citing Cases

Powers v. Hiranandani

’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Oudheusden v. Oudheusden , 190 Conn. App. 169, 177–78, 209 A.3d 1282,…

Oudheusden v. Oudheusden

And (2) "[d]id the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had abused its discretion by…