From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oubichon v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 8, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0838 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0838 GEB GGH P.

August 8, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a third amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

Since petitioner may be entitled to relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition.

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted;

2. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's third amended habeas petition filed June 29, 2007, within thirty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in the petition. See Rule 5, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases;

3. If the response to the habeas petition is an answer, petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer;

4. If the response to the habeas petition is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the motion, and respondents' reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fifteen days thereafter;

5. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General;

6. Petitioner's May 2, 2007, and June 15, 2007, motions for appointment of counsel are denied.


Summaries of

Oubichon v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 8, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0838 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Oubichon v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND OUBICHON, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 8, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0838 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2007)