From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ottenwaelder v. Rastelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1963
18 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

January 21, 1963


Motion by respondents to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant perfect and be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the March Term, beginning March 4, 1963; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellants' brief must be served and filed on or before February 11, 1963. This disposition is without prejudice to the renewal of the motion to dismiss on the argument of the appeal upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not timely served, if respondents be so advised. Beldock, P.J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ottenwaelder v. Rastelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1963
18 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Ottenwaelder v. Rastelli

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT OTTENWAELDER et al., Respondents, v. SANTUCCIO RASTELLI et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1963

Citations

18 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)