From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ottah v. Verifone Sys.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 11, 2022
21 Civ. 9645 (AT) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 9645 (AT) (GWG)

07-11-2022

CHIKEZIE OTTAH, Plaintiff, v. VERIFONE SYSTEM INC., Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Report & Recommendation (the “R&R”) of the Honorable Gabriel W. Gorenstein, was filed on ECF on June 21, 2022, and mailed to Plaintiff pro se on June 22, 2022. ECF No. 35; June 22, 2022 Dkt. Entry. The Court received no objections by the deadline of July 6, 2022. See Horton v. City of New York, 636 Fed.Appx. 822, 823 (2d Cir. 2016) (mailing of a report and recommendation is service within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)). Therefore, the Court reviewed the R&R for clear error, and found none. Santiago v. Colvin, 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014).

The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety, and DISMISSES the case. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all open motions, close the case, and mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ottah v. Verifone Sys.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 11, 2022
21 Civ. 9645 (AT) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Ottah v. Verifone Sys.

Case Details

Full title:CHIKEZIE OTTAH, Plaintiff, v. VERIFONE SYSTEM INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 11, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 9645 (AT) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)