From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Otis v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 11, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-0115 (M.D. Pa. May. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-0115

05-11-2012

JASON OTIS and JANET OTIS, individually, and as Parent and Natural Guardian of DOMINICK OTIS, Plaintiffs, v. CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA, LLC, CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION, and NOMAC DRILLING, LLC, Defendants.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


MEMORANDUM

NOW, this 11th day of May, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiffs' Motion for Relief from the Court's Order to Stay Pending Arbitration (Doc. 14) is DENIED.

(2) Defendants' Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing and for Leave to Conduct Limited Pre-Hearing Discovery (Doc. 17) is DENIED as moot.

(3) The action is STAYED until arbitration is completed.

____________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Otis v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 11, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-0115 (M.D. Pa. May. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Otis v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JASON OTIS and JANET OTIS, individually, and as Parent and Natural…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 11, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-0115 (M.D. Pa. May. 11, 2012)

Citing Cases

Straker v. Valencik

Otis v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, 2012 WL 1657930, at *4 (M.D.Pa. May 11, 2012) (citing cases). At…

Soly v. Warlick

"[C]ourts in the Third Circuit have routinely rejected Rule 60(b) requests where the movant fails to provide…