From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Otis Elevator Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 8, 1926
127 Misc. 421 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)

Opinion

June 8, 1926.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.

Michael Seinfeld [ Benjamin Kirschstein of counsel], for the appellant.

Phillips Avery [ Talbot M. Malcolm of counsel], for the respondent.

Benjamin Bardondess [ Gustav W.M. Wieboldt of counsel], for the respondent Miller.


The judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the impleaded defendant Reisberg was improper, as any judgment under subdivision 2, section 193 of the Civil Practice Act against such defendant should run in favor only of the defendant originally joined. ( Bozzuffi v. Darrieusecq, 125 Misc. 178.) The judgment is, therefore, modified so as to read in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Miller and in favor of the defendant Miller against the impleaded defendant Reisberg, and thus affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs to the defendant Reisberg against the plaintiff.

All concur; present, DELEHANTY, LYDON and LEVY, JJ.


Summaries of

Otis Elevator Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 8, 1926
127 Misc. 421 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)
Case details for

Otis Elevator Co. v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Respondent, v. SOLOMON MILLER, Respondent, and…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 8, 1926

Citations

127 Misc. 421 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)
216 N.Y.S. 320

Citing Cases

Wilson v. United American Lines

the event that the plaintiff, Wilson, succeeds against it, the United American Lines, Inc. This is a…

Society of Hosp v. Mogensen

This record does not permit an amendment of the judgment so as to grant judgment against the defendant and in…