From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Otalora v. Solimeo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2000
276 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued September 7, 2000

October 2, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant, Luigi Solimeo, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated September 16, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for reargument, and upon reargument, granted the plaintiffs leave to serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint substituting Palian, Inc., as the defendant in place of Luigi Solimeo.

Harrington, Ocko Monk, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Steven R. Kramer and Gloria Bisogno of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cervini, Jackson Heights, N.Y., for respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The defendant is not aggrieved by the order appealed from, and therefore has no standing to appeal (see, CPLR 5511; Berrios v. Rockefeller Group, 212 A.D.2d 495; Gomberg v. Gorman, 117 A.D.2d 583).


Summaries of

Otalora v. Solimeo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2000
276 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Otalora v. Solimeo

Case Details

Full title:ROSALBINA OTALORA, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. LUIGI SOLIMEO, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

276 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 879

Citing Cases

LoCiciro v. Metropolitan Trans. Authority

The MTA is not aggrieved by that portion of the order which granted the plaintiff leave to serve the Long…

HSBC Bank USA v. Cadore

Turning to Mr. McCray's position that the Prior Decision was void, such arguments are unavailing. The court…