From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oswalt v. Glikis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-1327 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-1327

08-04-2011

Kathleen Oswalt, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Leslie Glikis, Defendant.


AMBROSE, Senior District Judge

ORDER OF COURT

In light of the fact that I have dismissed all claims over which I have original jurisdiction (ECF No. [26]), I decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction as to the remaining state-law claims against Leslie Glikis. Accordingly, I dismiss these claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '1367(c)(3), albeit without prejudice to refiling the claims in state court. The dismissal of the state-law claims without prejudice should not work to Plaintiffs' disadvantage. Section 1367(d) provides for at least a 30-day tolling of any applicable statute of limitation so as to allow a plaintiff to refile his/her claims in state court.

This case shall be marked "Closed."

BY THE COURT:

Donetta W. Ambrose

United States Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Oswalt v. Glikis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-1327 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Oswalt v. Glikis

Case Details

Full title:Kathleen Oswalt, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Leslie Glikis, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 4, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-1327 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 4, 2011)