Opinion
11-cv-0001 MV/SMV
01-28-2013
CHINONYEREM OSUAGWU, Plaintiff, v. GILA REG'L MED. CTR.; JEAN REMILLARD, M.D.; GREGORY KOURY, M.D.; MICHAEL SARGENT, M.D.; MARK DONNELL, M.D.; RONALD DEHYLE, M.D.; and DON WHITE, M.D., Defendants.
ORDER CLARIFYING STATUS OF CASE
THIS MATTER is before the Court on an informal telephonic inquiry from counsel for the individual Defendants. It appears that there may be some confusion about the Memorandum Opinion and Order [Doc. 198] ("MOO"), issued by the Honorable Martha Vázquez, United States District Judge, on December 21, 2012. For clarity's sake, the MOO's reference to bifurcation was related to that order only. See MOO [Doc. 198] at 1. The order does not bifurcate the case itself. Therefore, all parties in the case should participate in pretrial matters, including the pretrial order, as scheduled.
Counsel for the individual Defendants represented that pro se Plaintiff was aware of, and in agreement with, the informal telephonic inquiry.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR
United States Magistrate Judge