Acheson, 24 N.J. Misc. 133 (Ch. 1946); (3) illness, disability or infirmity arising after the original judgment, e.g., Kirshbaum v.Kirshbaum, 129 N.J. Eq. 429 (E A 1941); Limpert v. Limpert, 119 N.J. Super. 438 (App.Div. 1972); see Ostrow v. Ostrow, 59 N.J. Super. 299, 305-306 (App.Div. 1960); (4) the dependent spouse's loss of a house or apartment, Jackson v. Jackson, 140 N.J. Eq. 124 (E A 1947); McLeod v. McLeod, 131 N.J. Eq. 44 (E A 1942);
We are satisfied from our study of the entire record that the judge properly exercised his discretion in ordering increased support for the children. See Martindell v. Martindell, 21 N.J. 341, 355 (1956); Ostrow v. Ostrow, 59 N.J. Super. 299, 303 (App.Div. 1960). The support awarded was "fit, reasonable and just" in the circumstances.
Accordingly, plaintiff had a one-half interest in the personal property and the court below properly awarded her $6,750 to cover her share in the loss thereof. Cf. Eberhard v. Eberhard, 4 N.J. 535, 555 (1950); Ostrow v. Ostrow, 59 N.J. Super. 299, 304 (App.Div. 1960). Defendant relies on N.J.S.A. 37:2-14 providing that the "paraphernalia of a married woman, being the suitable ornaments and wearing apparel of a married woman, which have come to her through her husband during marriage, shall be her separate property."