From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osterback v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 21, 1991
574 So. 2d 327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-448.

February 21, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County; C. Vernon Mize, Jr., Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment and a consecutive term of forty years. Under the sentencing guidelines, the recommended range was life imprisonment. The trial court failed to provide contemporaneous written reasons justifying departure. This constituted error. Robinson v. State, 520 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1988); Edwards v. State, 570 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). However, because the trial court did not realize that it was imposing a departure sentence, on remand the trial court must be permitted to consider whether departure is appropriate and, if so, to set forth valid reasons for departure. State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1989).

We have considered defendant's other points on appeal and we find them to be without merit.

Therefore, we affirm the convictions and reverse the departure sentence and remand for resentencing.

Judgment AFFIRMED; sentence REVERSED and cause REMANDED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Osterback v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 21, 1991
574 So. 2d 327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Osterback v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK ERIC OSTERBACK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 21, 1991

Citations

574 So. 2d 327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Hicks v. State

No objection was made by the defendant at the hearing although the sentence exceeded the maximum guideline…