Opinion
Decided April 20, 1990
The named defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 40, is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court err in holding that the constitutional issues raised by the defendants need not have been considered by the trial court in a summary process action?
"2. Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the motion of the defendants to sell their mobile home on the leased premises pursuant to General Statutes 21-79 during the pendency of the summary process action was properly denied?"
F. Woodward Lewis, Jr., in support of the petition.
Barry T. Pontolillo, in opposition.