From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oskuie v. Eop

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2022
2:22-cv-1107 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1107 CKD P

06-29-2022

KAYRAN MOHAMMAD OSKUIE, Petitioner, v. EOP, Respondent.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, an inmate at Atascadero State Hospital proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

Oskuie v. Eop

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2022
2:22-cv-1107 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Oskuie v. Eop

Case Details

Full title:KAYRAN MOHAMMAD OSKUIE, Petitioner, v. EOP, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-1107 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)