From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osio v. Moros

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Sep 15, 2022
1:21-cv-20706-GAYLES/TORRES (S.D. Fla. Sep. 15, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-20706-GAYLES/TORRES

09-15-2022

MEUDY ALBAN OSIO in her personal capacity and in her capacity as the personal representative of the Estate of FERNANDO ALBERTO ALBAN, FERNANDO ALBAN OSIO, and MARIA FERNANDA ALBAN OSIO, Plaintiffs, v. NICOLAS MADURO MOROS; FUERZAS ARMADAS REVOLUCIONARIAS DE COLOMBIA “FARC”; THE CARTEL OF THE SUNS A.K.A. CARTEL DE LOS SOLES; VLADIMIR PADRINO LOPEZ; MAIKEL JOSE MORENO PEREZ; NESTOR LUIS REVEROL TORRES; and TAREK WILLIAM SAAB, Defendants.


ORDER

DARRIN P. GAYLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT-JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres's Report and Recommendation (the “Report”), [ECF No. 56], regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgement Against Defendant Cartel of the Suns. [ECF No. 46]. On October 5, 2021, the Court referred this case to Judge Torres, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for a ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion. [ECF No. 48]. On September 5, 2022, Judge Torres issued his Report recommending that Plaintiff's motion for default judgement be granted. [ECF No. 56]. No objections were filed by either party.

A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which objections are made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific objections are made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F.Supp.2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006).

Having reviewed the Report for clear error, the Court agrees with Judge Torres's well-reasoned analysis and conclusion that the Motion should be granted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres's Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 56], is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order by reference.
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgement Against Defendant Cartel of the Suns, [ECF No. 46], is GRANTED.
3. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, final judgment shall be entered separately.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Osio v. Moros

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Sep 15, 2022
1:21-cv-20706-GAYLES/TORRES (S.D. Fla. Sep. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Osio v. Moros

Case Details

Full title:MEUDY ALBAN OSIO in her personal capacity and in her capacity as the…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Sep 15, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-20706-GAYLES/TORRES (S.D. Fla. Sep. 15, 2022)

Citing Cases

Sirer v. Aksoy

ssertion that Plaintiff is affiliated with a terrorist organization. See Stone, 2015 WL 13326350, at *4…