From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osibamowo v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 5, 2020
No. CV 17-1192-CAS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. May. 5, 2020)

Opinion

No. CV 17-1192-CAS (AGR)

05-05-2020

HOWARD OSIBAMOWO, Petitioner, v. ERIC ARNOLD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that

(1) Petitioner's motion to dismiss without prejudice the unexhausted claims - Subclaim 6 of Ground One, Subclaims 2 and 3 of Ground Five, Subclaim 2 of Ground Seven, and Ground Nine - is granted;

(2) Judgment be entered denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing the action with prejudice.
DATED: May 5, 2020

/s/_________

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Osibamowo v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 5, 2020
No. CV 17-1192-CAS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. May. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Osibamowo v. Arnold

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD OSIBAMOWO, Petitioner, v. ERIC ARNOLD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 5, 2020

Citations

No. CV 17-1192-CAS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. May. 5, 2020)