From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oshlo Wilkinson Dairy Queen v. Blume

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Dec 24, 2014
860 N.W.2d 924 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13–1865.

12-24-2014

OSHLO WILKINSON DAIRY QUEEN, An Iowa Partnership, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Guy BLUME, Defendant–Appellant.

Guy Blume, Altura, Minnesota, appellant pro se. Robert M. Livingston of Stuart Tinley Law Firm, L.L.P., Council Bluffs, for appellee.


Guy Blume, Altura, Minnesota, appellant pro se.

Robert M. Livingston of Stuart Tinley Law Firm, L.L.P., Council Bluffs, for appellee.

Considered by DANILSON, C.J., and DOYLE and TABOR, JJ.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having reviewed the record in this matter, we affirm the district court orders in their entirety without opinion pursuant to Iowa Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.1203 subsections (a) and (d).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Oshlo Wilkinson Dairy Queen v. Blume

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Dec 24, 2014
860 N.W.2d 924 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Oshlo Wilkinson Dairy Queen v. Blume

Case Details

Full title:OSHLO WILKINSON DAIRY QUEEN, An Iowa Partnership, Plaintiff–Appellee, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Dec 24, 2014

Citations

860 N.W.2d 924 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)