From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oshiro v. Bachman

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 21, 2024
2:22-cv-02100-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02100-APG-BNW

11-21-2024

PERRY BRIAN OSHIRO, Plaintiff v. M. BACHMAN, Defendant


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPEAL TRANSCRIPTS [ECF NO. 71]

Andrew P. Gordon, Chief United States District Judge.

Plaintiff Perry Oshiro moves for the government to pay for transcripts he wants to use on his appeal. ECF No. 71. “[T]he court may grant a motion for transcripts at government expense only if ‘the trial judge or circuit judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous' and the appeal presents a ‘substantial question.'” Dela Cruz v. Brennan, No. 19-cv-01140-DMR, 2023 WL 4550942, at *1 (N.D. Cal. June 20, 2023) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 735(f) and citing to Henderson v. United States, 734 F.2d 483, 484 (9th Cir. 1984)). I have not and will not certify that Oshiro's appeal is not frivolous. I therefore deny the motion for appeal transcripts. However, Oshiro is free to seek that relief from the court of appeals.

I THEREFORE ORDER that Perry Oshiro's motion (ECF No. 71) is denied.


Summaries of

Oshiro v. Bachman

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 21, 2024
2:22-cv-02100-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2024)
Case details for

Oshiro v. Bachman

Case Details

Full title:PERRY BRIAN OSHIRO, Plaintiff v. M. BACHMAN, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 21, 2024

Citations

2:22-cv-02100-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2024)