Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03349-REB-MEH
03-14-2012
FUJIKO OSHIMA, individually, DENIS DUPEYRON, individually and collectively as Next Friends of LENA DUPEYRON, a minor and TOMI DUPEYRON, a minor, Plaintiffs, v. KIA MOTORS CORPORATION, KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., HYUNDAI-KIA AMERICA TECHNICAL CENTER, INC., HYUNDAI-KIA AMERICA TECHNICAL CENTER, INC. (L.A. DESIGN STUDIO), and GRAND AUTO, INC., d/b/a GRAND BUICK KIA GMC, Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on March 14, 2012.
The Unopposed Motion for Entry of Protective Order [filed March 9, 2012; docket #31] is denied without prejudice and the proposed Stipulated Protective Order is refused for two reasons. First, paragraph 3 of the proposed Stipulated Protective Order fails to properly and clearly describe the procedure for challenging confidentiality, as set forth in Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000). Second, paragraph 10 of the proposed Stipulated Protective Order is improper insofar as the Court will not retain jurisdiction over a protective order after the case is closed. The parties are granted leave to submit a revised proposed protective order in accordance with Gillard and this minute order.