From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osheroff v. Osheroff

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 4, 1997
694 So. 2d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-3535

Opinion filed June 4, 1997.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Arthur L. Rothenberg, Judge.

Tew Beasley and Steven M. Katzman and Charles S. Marion, for appellant.

Harry A. Payton and Greg Tung Nguyen, for appellee.

Before COPE and GREEN, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.


We reverse the order entering default and default judgment against the defendant-appellant as a sanction because counsel filed a motion to dismiss instead of an answer pursuant to an agreed order requiring the filing of a "responsive pleading." See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.100(a) (defining "pleadings"). "This was much too harsh a sanction for the minor dereliction involved and thus constituted a plain abuse of discretion." Techno Indus. Corp. v. Cooper Indus., Inc., 410 So.2d 584, 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)(citations omitted); see also Joseph v. Marese, 534 So.2d 920, 921 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Thaw, Gopman Assocs., P.A. v. Jack J. Greenberg, M.D. Assocs., P.A., 595 So.2d 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly the final judgment and default are reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Osheroff v. Osheroff

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 4, 1997
694 So. 2d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Osheroff v. Osheroff

Case Details

Full title:MARC A. OSHEROFF, APPELLANT, vs. LEONARD OSHEROFF, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 4, 1997

Citations

694 So. 2d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Pierce v. Kroha

PER CURIAM.The trial court entered a default judgment after Appellants (defendants below) filed a motion to…