From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Shea v. Bittrolff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2003
302 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-03760

Submitted November 12, 2002.

February 13, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated March 7, 2002, as granted the defendant's motion to vacate an order of the same court dated May 16, 2001, granting the plaintiff's motion for leave to enter judgment upon the defendant's default in appearing or answering.

Tinari, O'Connell Osborn, LLP, Commack, N.Y. (Frank A. Tinari of counsel), for appellant.

Schondebare Brown, LLP, Ronkonkoma, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the order dated May 16, 2001, is reinstated.

It is incumbent upon a defendant moving to vacate a default judgment to show a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a meritorious defense (see Koslosky v. Koslosky, 267 A.D.2d 357). The defendant did not offer a reasonable excuse for his default. The only excuse offered for the failure to serve a timely answer and to oppose the plaintiff's motion for leave to enter a default judgment was delay caused by the defendant's insurance carrier, which is insufficient (see Miles v. Blue Label Trucking, 232 A.D.2d 382).

FLORIO, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, McGINITY and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Shea v. Bittrolff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2003
302 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

O'Shea v. Bittrolff

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT O'SHEA, appellant, v. KEVIN BITTROLFF, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 737

Citing Cases

Sugamele v. JPMC Specialty Mortg.

the requisite showing has been made and the requisite proof proffered, said motion shall be granted unless…

Smolinski v. Smolinski

" That proffered excuse is unavailing, inasmuch as it does not explain the failure of defendant to appear or…