From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osechas v. Arcila

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Feb 6, 2019
271 So. 3d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 3D18-1897

02-06-2019

Andres Sultan OSECHAS, Petitioner, v. Sarah Correa ARCILA, Respondent.

Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A. and Alyssa M. Reiter and Brandon J. Hechtman (Fort Lauderdale), for petitioner. Michael T. Flanagan; James C. Blecke, for respondent.


Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A. and Alyssa M. Reiter and Brandon J. Hechtman (Fort Lauderdale), for petitioner.

Michael T. Flanagan; James C. Blecke, for respondent.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petition denied.

SCALES, J. specially concurring. I concur in the denial of the petition because the limitations of our review – i.e., the exacting certiorari standard – require this result. At the risk, though, of sounding like a broken record, I again encourage the Florida Bar's Appellate Rules Committee to consider adding to the schedule of non-final appealable orders found in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3) those orders granting leave to amend a complaint to add punitive damages. Given how such interlocutory orders materially alter the course of civil litigation, I fail to see how the certiorari standard is more appropriate than an appellate standard. TRG Desert Inn Venture, Ltd. v. Berezovsky, 194 So.3d 516, 520 n.5 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) ; Levin v. Pritchard, 258 So.3d 545, 548 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Primitive people used to listen to music on things called "records" made of vinyl. The record revolved on a platter called a "turntable," and a "stylus" would magically convert into music the hidden indentations in the grooves of such records. Upon encountering a dust particle embedded in such a groove, the stylus would become temporarily unseated from the groove. Because of the turntable's revolution, when the stylus reconnected with the groove, the listener would hear the same portion of the music heard immediately prior to the stylus encountering the dust particle. Hence, the same music repeated over and over until the dust particle became dislodged or the listener manually adjusted the stylus. The aggravated listener often referred to the record containing dusty grooves as a "broken record."
--------


Summaries of

Osechas v. Arcila

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Feb 6, 2019
271 So. 3d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Osechas v. Arcila

Case Details

Full title:Andres Sultan Osechas, Petitioner, v. Sarah Correa Arcila, Respondent.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Feb 6, 2019

Citations

271 So. 3d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Rodriguez

We are mindful that, recently, the Fourth District reached the same result as here but also "note[d] that…

Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs. v. Rodriguez

We are mindful that, recently, the Fourth District reached the same result as here but also "note[d] that…