From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osborne v. Ray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jul 3, 2013
No.: 3:13-cv-216 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 3, 2013)

Opinion

No.: 3:13-cv-216

07-03-2013

JOSHUA ANDREW OSBORNE, Plaintiff, v. DAVID RAY, et al., Defendants.


(VARLAN/SHIRLEY)


MEMORANDUM

On May 15, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to complete and return the service packets for the defendants within 20 days. Plaintiff was forewarned that failure to return the completed service packets could jeopardize his prosecution of this action. Plaintiff has failed to return the service packets or otherwise respond to the order of this Court. Therefore, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, sua sponte, for failure to prosecute and to comply with the orders of this Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1991). The Court will CERTIFY that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 24.

AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER.

Thomas A. Varlan

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Osborne v. Ray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jul 3, 2013
No.: 3:13-cv-216 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Osborne v. Ray

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA ANDREW OSBORNE, Plaintiff, v. DAVID RAY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Jul 3, 2013

Citations

No.: 3:13-cv-216 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 3, 2013)