From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osborne v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1968
30 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

June 18, 1968


Order entered March 13, 1968, appealed from, unanimously modified on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion to provide that the continued examination of the named employees of General Motors Corporation shall be by written interrogatories or open commission in Michigan at the option of the examining party. In the special circumstances of this case, it is appropriate that further examination of the employees be had in Michigan. The parties shall pay their respective expenses which may be taxed as costs by the party prevailing. ( Pakter v. Lilly Co., 19 A.D.2d 810; Piel v. Lilly Co., 19 A.D.2d 810; Walborsky v. Wolf, 28 A.D.2d 1120; B.B. D. Prods. v. Screen Gems, 29 A.D.2d 747.) As so modified the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Stevens, Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Osborne v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1968
30 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Osborne v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:KURT J. OSBORNE, as Parent and Natural Guardian of CAROLL J. OSBORNE, an…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

ZVI Englander & Co. v. Leslie Kleyman Corp.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 27, 1970, denying plaintiff's motion for the…

Matter of Ratner v. Ratner

) See CPLR 3108; Bottalico v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 33 A.D.2d 756 (1st Dept.); Osborne v. Miller, 30…