From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osborne v. City of Harlingen

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Jul 25, 2024
No. 13-24-00001-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 25, 2024)

Opinion

13-24-00001-CV

07-25-2024

JOHN DAVID OSBORNE JR., Appellant, v. THE CITY OF HARLINGEN, AS THE OWNER AND OPERATOR OF VALLEY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, Appellee.


ON APPEAL FROM THE 103RD DISTRICT COURT OF CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Peña

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GINA M. BENAVIDES, JUSTICE

This matter is before the Court on appellant's motion to dismiss. Appellant no longer wishes to pursue this appeal.

The Court, having considered the unopposed motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs will be taxed against the appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Because the appeal is dismissed at the appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.


Summaries of

Osborne v. City of Harlingen

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Jul 25, 2024
No. 13-24-00001-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Osborne v. City of Harlingen

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DAVID OSBORNE JR., Appellant, v. THE CITY OF HARLINGEN, AS THE OWNER…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg

Date published: Jul 25, 2024

Citations

No. 13-24-00001-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 25, 2024)