From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osborn v. Oregon Wellness LLC

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 21, 2005
Case No. 04-1187-JE (D. Or. Nov. 21, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 04-1187-JE.

November 21, 2005

Craig A. Crispin, Shelley D. Russell, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Anne E. Denecke, Elisabeth C. Knight, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Defendant.


ORDER


The Honorable John Jelderks, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on October 14, 2005, and referred them to me on November 4, 2005. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation (#38).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (#18) is granted as to Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim only. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and dismisses the state law claims without prejudice.


Summaries of

Osborn v. Oregon Wellness LLC

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 21, 2005
Case No. 04-1187-JE (D. Or. Nov. 21, 2005)
Case details for

Osborn v. Oregon Wellness LLC

Case Details

Full title:MEGAN J. OSBORN, Plaintiff, v. OREGON WELLNESS LLC., an Oregon limited…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 21, 2005

Citations

Case No. 04-1187-JE (D. Or. Nov. 21, 2005)