From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osborn v. City of Waterbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 30, 2018
329 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2018)

Opinion

05-30-2018

Tatayana OSBORN et al. v. CITY OF WATERBURY et al.

Richard M. Franchi, New Haven, in support of the petition. Daniel J. Foster, in opposition.


The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 181 Conn.App. 239, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. In reversing the judgment of the trial court, did the Appellate Court properly determine that expert testimony was necessary to establish the standard of care?

"2. Did the plaintiffs receive adequate notice of the need for expert testimony to determine the scope of the duty of care such that a directed judgment was appropriate in this case?"


Summaries of

Osborn v. City of Waterbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 30, 2018
329 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2018)
Case details for

Osborn v. City of Waterbury

Case Details

Full title:Tatayana OSBORN et al. v. CITY OF WATERBURY et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 30, 2018

Citations

329 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2018)
184 A.3d 1214

Citing Cases

Osborn v. City of Waterbury

(2) "Did the plaintiffs receive adequate notice of the need for expert testimony to determine the scope of…