From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osband v. Warden

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 3, 2011
No. CIV S-97-0152 KJM, DEATH PENALTY CASE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-97-0152 KJM, DEATH PENALTY CASE.

February 3, 2011


ORDER


Pursuant to the December 20, 2010 Order, the parties have met and conferred and filed a joint statement proposing a method for identifying portions of the evidentiary hearing exhibits that should remain sealed. (Doc. No. 585.) The court finds the parties' suggested procedure acceptable. According, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Petitioner's counsel shall load all evidentiary hearing exhibits into trial presentation software. Petitioner's counsel will then digitally highlight those sections of each exhibit petitioner requests the court retain under seal. By February 28, 2011, petitioner's counsel shall send to respondent's counsel digital files containing the highlighted exhibits in .pdf format.

2. Before March 31, 2011, the parties shall meet and confer to identify their agreements and disagreements regarding the sections of the exhibits to remain sealed.

3. By March 31, 2011, the parties shall file a joint statement identifying and explaining their agreements and disagreements regarding the sections of the exhibits to remain sealed. The joint statement shall be accompanied by copies of the highlighted exhibits.

DATED: February 1, 2011.


Summaries of

Osband v. Warden

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 3, 2011
No. CIV S-97-0152 KJM, DEATH PENALTY CASE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Osband v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:LANCE IAN OSBAND, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 3, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-97-0152 KJM, DEATH PENALTY CASE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2011)