Osantowski v. Wolfenbarger

Full title: ANDREW PAUL OSANTOWSKI, Petitioner, v. HUGH WOLFENBARGER, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 15, 2010

Civil No. 08-13759 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-13759.

July 15, 2010

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

LAWRENCE ZATKOFF, District Judge

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus [dkt 1]. The matter is currently before the Court on Magistrate Judge Komives's Report and Recommendation [dkt 20], in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. The Magistrate Judge also recommends that a certificate of appealability be denied. Petitioner has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time period in which to do so has expired.

The Court has thoroughly reviewed the court file and the Report and Recommendation. As a result of that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and enters it as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus [dkt 1] is DENIED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.