From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orvis v. Curtiss

New York Common Pleas — General Term
May 1, 1894
8 Misc. 681 (N.Y. Misc. 1894)

Opinion

May, 1894.

H.G. Harris, for appellant.

F.G. Gedney, for respondent.


The justice had no jurisdiction to render the judgment he did in this case, because he rendered it after the time limited by law for his doing so. This appears from the return itself. Therefore, the judgment must be reversed, with costs.

Present: BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF and PRYOR, JJ.

Judgment reversed, with costs.


Summaries of

Orvis v. Curtiss

New York Common Pleas — General Term
May 1, 1894
8 Misc. 681 (N.Y. Misc. 1894)
Case details for

Orvis v. Curtiss

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. ORVIS, Respondent, v . WILLIAM H. CURTISS, Appellant

Court:New York Common Pleas — General Term

Date published: May 1, 1894

Citations

8 Misc. 681 (N.Y. Misc. 1894)

Citing Cases

Penniman v. LaGrange

The record before us shows that the trial justice lost jurisdiction of the action by his failure to render…

Orvis v. Curtis

This does not clearly indicate whether such record was admitted, but at page 7 of the return we find that "it…