From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ortlieb v. City of Henderson

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 11, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-02454-LDG-GWF (D. Nev. May. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-02454-LDG-GWF.

May 11, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The Complaint (#1) in this matter was filed December 30, 2009. Defendants filed their Answer (#18) on March 23, 2011. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 days thereafter to file a mandatory stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order not later than May 23, 2011 in compliance with the provisions of LR 26-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.


Summaries of

Ortlieb v. City of Henderson

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 11, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-02454-LDG-GWF (D. Nev. May. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Ortlieb v. City of Henderson

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HENRY ORTLIEB, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HENDERSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 11, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-02454-LDG-GWF (D. Nev. May. 11, 2011)